NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Lechmana v R [2019] NSWCCA 112 Hearing dates: 11 March 2019 Date of orders: 16 August 2019 Decision date: 16 August 2019 Before: Payne JA at [1] Bellew J at [15] Campbell J at [21] Decision: (1) Time for bringing the application for leave to appeal is extended to 30 October 2018; (2) Grant leave to appeal; (3) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Appeals – whether sentencing judge fell into Muldrock error – whether instinctive synthesis correctly undertaken – findings as to factual circumstances well founded – findings about failure of applicant to take responsibility well founded – findings about absence of contrition well founded – comparable cases not indicative of excessive sentence - lesser sentence not warranted. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 23A Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 54A; 54B, Div 1A Pt 4 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 6(3) Cases Cited: Abdulrahman v R [2016] NSWCCA 192 Aytugrul v R [2015] NSWCCA 139 Barbaro v The Queen (2014) 253 CLR 58; [2014] HCA 2 Davis v R [2015] NSWCCA 90 Director of Public Prosecutions v Dalgliesh (a pseudonym) (2017) 262 CLR 428; [2017] HCA 41 Hili v R; Jones v R (2010) 242 CLR 520; [2010] HCA 45 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Kentwell v The Queen (2014) 252 CLR 601; [2014] Majid v R [2016] NSWCCA 289 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 Muldrock v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 120; [2011] HCA 39 R v Biles (No 2) [2017] NSWSC 525 R v DeBeyer [2017] NSWSC 1700 R v Do (No 4) [2015] NSWSC 512 R v Fesus (No 9) [2018] NSWSC 176 R v Haydar (No 4) [2017] NSWSC 615 R v Hejabian [2016] NSWSC 1692 R v Serutawke [2014] NSWSC 1762 R v Way (2004) 60 NSWLR 168; [2004] NSWCCA 131 Rajendran v R [2014] NSWCCA 113 Wang v R [2017] NSWCCA 61 Yun v R [2017] NSWCCA 317 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Nanthagopal Nanthagopal Lechmana (Applicant) Regina (Respondent Crown) Representation: Counsel: Dr G.D. Woods QC with T.F. Woods (Applicant) Dr D. Kell with Ms E. Jones (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate