NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Castagna v R; Agius v R [2019] NSWCCA 114 Hearing dates: 3–4 April 2019 Date of orders: 05 June 2019 Decision date: 05 June 2019 Before: Bathurst CJ; Macfarlan JA; Gleeson JA Decision: (1) Appeals allowed. (2) Convictions of each appellant on Counts 1, 2 and 13 be quashed and, in lieu thereof, a verdict of acquittal be entered. Catchwords: INCOME TAX – Ordinary income – agreement to make payments to a company in exchange for supply of services by a consultant – company did not operate any business other than the supply of services by the consultant – whether payments were ordinary income derived by the consultant
CRIME – Appeals – Appeal against conviction – New trial – prosecution advanced argument on appeal not raised at trial to support conviction– significant elapse of time since offences and likely delay in new trial – whether appropriate to make an order for a new trial Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Criminal Code (WA) Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth). Cases Cited: Agius v The Queen (2013) 248 CLR 601; [2013] HCA 27 Alexander v Commissioner of Taxation (2014) 99 ATR 773; [2014] FCA 1161 Associated Alloys Pty Ltd v ACN 001 452 106 Pty Ltd (in liq) (2000) 202 CLR 588; [2000] HCA 25 Baker v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1989) 20 ATR 1706 Baker v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1989) 20 ATR 798 Bayly v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1977) 15 SASR 446 Business & Research Management Pty Ltd (In liquidation) v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (2008) 173 FCR 204; [2008] FCA 1652 Byrnes v Kendle (2011) 243 CLR 253 Commissioner of Australian Federal Police v Hart (2019) 262 CLR 76; [2018] HCA 1 Coulls v Bagot's Executor and Trustee Co Ltd (1967) 119 CLR 460 Equuscorp Pty Ltd v Glengallen Investments Pty Ltd (2004) 218 CLR 471; [2004] HCA 55 Federal Coke Co Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1977) 15 ALR 449 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Bamford (2010) 240 CLR 481 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Mochkin (2003) 127 FCR 185 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Montgomery v (1999) 198 CLR 639; [1999] HCA 34 Fowler v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (2008) 167 FCR 425; [2008] FCA 528 Gerakiteys v The Queen (1984) 153 CLR 317 Hayes v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1956) 96 CLR 47 Jiminez v The Queen (1992) 173 CLR 572; [1992] HCA 14 King v The Queen (1986) 161 CLR 423 Korda v Australian Executor Trustees (SA) Ltd (2015) 255 CLR 62; [2015] HCA 6 Liedig v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1994) 50 FCR 461 MacFarlane v Commissioner of Taxation (1986) 13 FCR 356 McEvoy v The Belfast Banking Co Ltd [1935] AC 24 Olsson v Dyson (1970) 120 CLR 365 Osborne v R; R v Osborne [2017] NSWCCA 11 Parker v The Queen (1997) 186 CLR 494; [1997] HCA 15 Peate v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (Cth) (1964) 111 CLR 443 Re Schebsman [1944] Ch 83 Reuter v Commissioner of Taxation (1993) 111 ALR 716 Reuter v Commissioner of Taxation (1993) 93 ATC 5030 Richardson v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1932) 48 CLR 192 Rotherwood v Commissioner of Taxation (1996) 64 FCR 313 Scott v Commissioner of Taxation (1935) 35 SR (NSW) 215 Scott v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1966) 117 CLR 514 The Queen v Taufahema (2007) 228 CLR 232; [2007] HCA 11 Trident General Insurance Co Ltd v McNiece Bros Pty Ltd (1988) 165 CLR 107 Tupicoff v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1984) 4 FCR 505 Union Fidelity Trustee Co of Australia Ltd & Mayfield v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1969) 119 CLR 177 Vandepitte v Preferred Accident Insurance Corporation of New York [1933] AC 70 Western Gold Mines NL v Commissioner of Taxation (WA) (1938) 59 CLR 729 Wilson v Darling Island Stevedoring and Lighterage Company Ltd (1956) 95 CLR 43 Zobory v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1995) 95 ATC 4251 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Anthony Castagna (first appellant) Robert Agius (second appellant) The Crown (respondent) Representation: Counsel: T Game SC with S White SC and T Epstein (first appellant) G Bashir SC with C Ensor (second appellant) P McDonald SC with M Hirschhorn, A McGrath and R Raffell (respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate