NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Insurance Australia Limited v Dent [2019] NSWCA 134 Hearing dates: 22 May 2019 Decision date: 07 June 2019 Before: Basten JA at [1]; Gleeson JA at [6]; McCallum JA at [53] Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal.
(2) Appeal allowed.
(3) Direct the applicant to file a notice of appeal in the form contained in the White Book within 7 days.
(4) Set aside orders 1 and 2 made by the primary judge on 6 September 2018, and in place order:
(a) Grant leave to Insurance Australia Limited to be joined as a party to the proceedings in the District Court No 2018/297094 pursuant to s 79 of the Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW);
(b) Costs of the joinder application are the intervenor's costs in the proceedings.
(5) The applicant to pay the first respondent's costs of the proceedings in this Court. Catchwords: APPEAL – leave to appeal – whether insurer should be joined as party to District Court proceedings against insured driver – Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW), s 79 – where real possibility of conflict between interests of insurer and insured driver Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 56 District Court Act 1973 (NSW), s 127 Motor Accidents Act 1988 (NSW), s 47A Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW), ss 3, 3A, 10, 16, 20, 23, 78, 79 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 42.1 Cases Cited: Leichhardt Municipal Council v Green [2004] NSWCA 341 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72; [1998] HCA 11 Rosniak v Government Insurance Office (1997) 41 NSWLR 608 SAS Trustee Corporation v Miles [2018] HCA 55; (2018) 92 ALJR 1064 The King v Commonwealth Court of Conciliation and Arbitration; Ex parte Barrett (1945) 70 CLR 141; [1945] HCA 50 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Insurance Australia Limited ABN 11 000 016 722 Trading as NRMA Insurance (Applicant) Stephen Douglas Dent (First Respondent) Braham Murray Williams (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr G M Jensen (Applicant) Mr B Dooley SC (First Respondent) Mr Williams (Self-represented) (Second Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate