NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Ahmad v Health Care Complaints Commission (No 2) [2019] NSWCATOD 87 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 11 June 2019 Decision date: 11 June 2019 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: A Britton, Principal Member R Samimi, Senior Member J Zwart, Senior Member B Seth, General Member Decision: Mr Ahmad must pay the costs of the Health Care Complaints Commission and failing agreement as assessed under the provisions of the Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014 (NSW). Catchwords: COSTS – whether a party's financial circumstances is relevant to the exercise of the power to make a cost order under cl 13, sch 5D to the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW). Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW) Cases Cited: Ahmad v Health Care Complaints Commission [2019] NSWCATOD 35 Arian v Nguyen [2001] NSWCA 5 Health Care Complaints Commission v Ahmad [2015] NSWCATOD 103 Health Care Complaints Commission v Do [2014] NSWCA 307 Health Care Complaints Commission v Philipiah [2013] NSWCA 342 NSW v Stanley [2007] NSWCA 330 Oshlack v Richmond River Council [1998] HCA 11; 193 CLR 72 Qasim v Health Care Complaints Commission [2015] NSWCA 282 Waterman v Gerling Australia Insurance Co Pty Ltd (No 2) [2005] NSWSC 1111 Category: Costs Parties: Tareq Ahmad (Applicant) Health Care Complaints Commission (Respondent) Representation: Meriden Lawyers (Applicant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate