NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Mahmoud El Ali v JGYM Pty Ltd (No 2) [2019] NSWSC 681 Hearing dates: 26 April 2019 Date of orders: 07 June 2019 Decision date: 07 June 2019 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Henry J Decision: (1) Subject to order 7, there be judgment by admissions for the third cross-claimant against the cross-defendant for $65,000.00 plus interest at 10% p.a. up to the end of 23 October 2015 of $3,250 and interest at 15% p.a. on $68,250.00 from 24 October 2015 to 26 April 2019 in the amount of $35,901.37, a total of $104,151.37. (2) The amended cross-claim otherwise be dismissed. (3) The first and second cross-claimants pay the cross-defendant's costs of the cross-claim and amended cross-claim. (4) The cross-defendant's notice of motion for security for costs be dismissed with no order as to costs. (5) The enforcement of the judgment in Order 1 be stayed pending the assessment of the costs orders made against the second, third and fifth defendants on 6 September 2018, the costs orders made against the first and second cross-claimants on 17 September 2018, the costs order made on 28 November 2018 and the costs order made in order 3 of these orders or until further order of the court. (6) The stay in order 5 is conditional upon the plaintiff/cross-defendant: (a) serving on the cross-claimants by their solicitors an application for assessment of the costs referred to in order 5 above by 5 July 2019; (b) filing with the Manager Costs Assessment his application for assessment of the orders referred to in order 5 by 9 August 2019; and (c) proceeding with all due expedition in the costs assessment. (7) The amount determined in favour of the cross-defendant in the costs assessment referred to in order 5 is to be set-off against the judgment amount in order 1 of these orders. (8) The parties have liberty to apply. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE — Cross-claims — Right of set-off — Costs — No issue of principle Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) 2005 ss 21, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 98 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 42.1 Cases Cited: Australian Beverages Distributors Pty Ltd v Evans & Tate Premium Wines Pty Ltd (2006) 230 ALR 184; [2006] NSWSC 560 Barescape Pty Limited as trustee for the V's Family Trust & Anor v Bacchus Holdings Pty Limited as trustee for The Bacchus Holdings Trust & Anor (No 10) [2012] NSWSC 1275 Corbett v Nguyen (No 2) [2012] NSWSC 673 Mahmoud El Ali v JGYM Pty Ltd [2018] NSWSC 1298 Padkohe Pty Ltd v Fletcher [2006] NSWSC 1239 Ventura v Higgins [2018] NSWSC 909 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Mahmoud El Ali – plaintiff /cross-defendant JGYM Pty Ltd (deregistered) – first defendant Ozem Kassem as joint and several liquidator of 39 Edward Street Sylvania Pty Ltd (in liq) – second defendant/first cross-claimant Jason Tang as joint and several liquidator of 39 Edward Street Sylvania Pty Ltd (in liq) – third defendant/second cross-claimant 39 Edward Street Sylvania Pty Ltd (in liq) – fifth defendant/third cross-claimant Representation: Counsel: M Elliott SC – plaintiff/cross-defendant R Marshall SC – second, third and fifth defendants/first, second and third cross-claimants
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate