NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Kaddour [2019] NSWDC 243 Hearing dates: 26 March 2019 Date of orders: 10 May 2019 Decision date: 10 May 2019 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Bright DCJ Decision: The evidence of the events at Bingara in 2015 is admissible as tendency evidence in relation to counts 1 – 5 for the purpose identified at [86].
The evidence of the events at Bingara in 2015 is admissible as coincidence evidence in relation to counts 4 and 5. Catchwords: Tendency evidence – temporal gap - relied upon to establish identity – coincidence evidence- alternative hypothesis – significant probative value. Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 Cases Cited: BC v R [2015] NSWCCA 327 CW v The Queen (2010) VSCA 288 El-Haddad v The Queen (2015) 88 NSWLR 93; Hughes v The Queen [2017] HCA 20 IMM v The Queen [2016] HCA 14; 257 CLR 300 NS v R [2012] NSWCCA 9 Page v The Queen [2015] VSCA 357 R v Duckworth [2012] NSWCCA 174 R v Ford (2009) 201 A Crim R 451 R v Gale; R v Duckworth [2012] NSWCCA 174 R v LN; R v AW (No. 1) [2017] NSWSC 119 R v RN [2005] NSWCCA 413 Selby v R [2017] NSWCCA 40 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina (Crown) Ahmed KADDOUR (Accused) Representation: Counsel: Mr Peter Lange of counsel for the Accused
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate