NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Mirrorcity Pty Ltd v SEO North Sydney Pty Ltd;; SEO North Sydney Pty Ltd v Mirrorcity Pty Ltd [2019] NSWCATCD 32 Hearing dates: 7 February 2019 Date of orders: 05 April 2019 Decision date: 05 April 2019 Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Before: S De Jersey, General Member Decision: 1. In matter GEN 18/45782, pursuant to section 79O Fair Trading Act NSW 1987 the Tribunal declares that Mirrorcity Pty Limited is not liable to SEO North Sydney Pty Limited for $24,000 plus GST.
2. The balance of application GEN 18/45782 is dismissed.
3. Application GEN 18/46966 is dismissed.
4. Each party to pay its own costs of GEN 18/45782 and GEN 18/46966. Catchwords: Search engine optimisation, breach of contract, Australian Consumer Law, costs Legislation Cited: Australian Consumer Law Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act NSW 2013 Fair Trading Act NSW 1987 Cases Cited: Neville v Lam (No 3) [2014] NSWSC 607 Saeedi v Fisher & Paykel Appliances Pty Limited [2016] NSWCATAP 235 (1 November 2016) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Proceedings GEN 18/45782: Mirrorcity Pty Ltd (Applicant) SEO North Sydney Pty Ltd (Respondent)
Proceedings GEN 18/46966: SEO North Sydney Pty Ltd (Applicant) Mirrorcity Pty Ltd (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Levitt Robinson Solicitors (SEO North Sydney Pty Ltd) File Number(s): GEN 18/45782 and GEN 18/46966 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate