NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Allstar Capital Pty Limited v FIP Holdings Victoria Pty Limited [2019] NSWSC 693 Hearing dates: 6 June 2019 Date of orders: 14 June 2019 Decision date: 14 June 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Davies J Decision: Pursuant to r 33.11 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules and s 98(4)(c) of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) I order the defendant to pay to the applicant costs fixed in the sum of $10,000. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – subpoenas – costs – cost of compliance – application by third party to recover its costs incurred in complying with subpoena issued by defendants – r 33.11 UCPR – applicant had previously acted for the plaintiff in a commercial transaction with the defendant that preceded the present proceedings – several subpoenas issued – first subpoena defective – large volume of documents required review – significant delay caused by defendant's solicitors – defendant's solicitors failed to agree to a reasonable request for adjournment of subpoenas – defendant's solicitors failed to negotiate with the applicant as to the amount of costs to be paid – r 42.33 UCPR – applicant sought fixed sum costs – applicant entitled to reasonable costs and fixed sum costs deemed reasonable
CIVIL PROCEDURE – appearance – where defendant is a company – where a director of the defendant signed a letter of authority authorising a third party to appear on defendant's behalf – third party was not a director nor an officer of the company – r 7.1 UCPR – rule dispensed with to avoid further delay Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) ss 14, 56, 98, 99 Federal Court Rules Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) rr 7.1, 33.11, 42.53 Cases Cited: A Pty Ltd v Z [2007] NSWSC 999 Foyster v Foyster Holdings [2003] NSWSC 881 Fuelxpress Ltd v L M Ericsson Pty Ltd (1987) 75 ALR 284 Kumagai Australia Finance v Avarton Ltd (Supreme Court (NSW), Bryson J, 7 June 1991, unrep) Marsden v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Ltd [2001] NSWSC 77 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: McCabes Lawyers Pty Ltd & McCabe Curwood Pty Ltd (Applicants) Allstar Capital Pty Limited (Plaintiff) FIP Holdings Victoria Pty Limited (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: L Dominish (Applicants) N Elali (by leave) (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate