NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Elanor Investors Limited v Sydney Zoo Pty Limited [2019] NSWLEC 80 Hearing dates: 4 June 2019 Date of orders: 12 June 2019 Decision date: 12 June 2019 Jurisdiction: Class 4 Before: Pain J Decision: See [33] of judgment Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for leave to rely on amended summons and amended points of claim – pleadings embarrassing as vague – essential facts necessary for claim to succeed not identified – leave to re-plead granted Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 s 56 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Cases Cited: Alexandria Landfill Pty Ltd Roads and Maritime Services; Boiling Pty Limited v Roads and Maritime Services (No 4) [2018] NSWLEC 31 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125; [1964] HCA 69 Gunns Limited v Marr [2005] VSC 251 Hastie Group Ltd (in liq) v Bourne; Hastie Group Ltd (in liq) v Moore [2017] NSWSC 709 HFPS Pty Limited (Trustee) v Tamaya Resources Limited (in Liq) (No 2) [2016] FCA 446 Knowles v Roberts (1888) 38 Ch D 263 at 270 McGuirk v University of New South Wales [2009] NSWSC 1424 Trans Realties Pty Ltd v Grbac [1975] 1 NSWLR 170 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Elanor Investors Limited (Applicant) Sydney Zoo Pty Limited (Respondent) Representation: COUNSEL: N Eastman (Applicant) A Shearer (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate