NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Davies v Smith [2019] NSWSC 700 Hearing dates: 3 June 2019 Decision date: 12 June 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Adamson J Decision: See paragraph [65] Catchwords: RESTRICTED PREMISES ACT 1943 – application for declaration – suspicion on reasonable grounds – effect of reputed criminals living on premises – whether declaration would effectively prevent defendant from residing in residential premises Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 60, 546C Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 9 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), ss 3, 4, 5, 6 Disorderly Houses Amendment (Commercial Supply of Prohibited Drugs) Act 2002 (NSW) Drugs Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW), s 36Y Restricted Premises Act 1943 (NSW), ss 2, 3, 6, 8 Weapons Prohibition Act 1998 (NSW), s 33 Cases Cited: Beeche v Smith Street Investments Pty Ltd [2018] NSWSC 544 Commissioner of Police v Tanos (1958) 98 CLR 383; [1958] HCA 6 Ex parte Fergusson; Re Olah Pty Ltd [1970] 1 NSWLR 713 Filippetti v R (1978) 13 A Crim R 335 George v Rockett (1990) 170 CLR 104; [1990] HCA 26 Greig v Irmak [2018] NSWSC Plenty v Dillon (1991) 171 CLR 635; [1991] HCA 5 Re Application of Shepard [1983] 1 NSWLR 265 Sibuse Pty Ltd v Shaw (1988) 13 NSWLR 98 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Detective Sergeant Evan Davies (Plaintiff) Malcolm Gordon Smith (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: F Rogers (Plaintiff) Defendant in person
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate