NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Manocha v R [2019] NSWCCA 122 Hearing dates: 22 March 2019 Date of orders: 14 June 2019 Decision date: 14 June 2019 Before: Basten JA at [1]; Adams J at [72]; Ierace J at [80] Decision: (1) Grant the applicant leave to appeal.
(2) Dismiss the appeal. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW — appeal against conviction — application for leave —conviction for recklessly causing grievous bodily harm and failing to provide child with necessities of life — medical and biomedical evidence of the cause of injuries — whether verdict unreasonable or cannot be supported having regard to evidence
CRIMINAL LAW — appeal against conviction — whether verdict unreasonable in light of acquittal on count of intentionally causing grievous bodily harm — whether modified circumstantial evidence direction should have been provided
CRIMINAL LAW — appeal against sentence — whether error in assessing objective criminality —precise mechanism of injury unknown Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mamta Manocha (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr I McLachlan (Applicant) Mr G Newton (Respondent)
Solicitors: Watsons (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2014/45019 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 16 June 2017 Before: Ingram SC DCJ File Number(s): 2014/45019
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate