NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Person "A" v The Commonwealth [2019] NSWSC 727 Hearing dates: 31 May 2019 Decision date: 31 May 2019 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Ward CJ in Eq Decision: Non-publication and non-disclosure orders made pursuant to the Court Suppression and Non-publication Orders Act 2010 (NSW) and the grounds set out in ss 8(1)(a), (b), (c) and (e) of that Act. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE — pseudonym orders and suppression orders – where in the interests of Australia's national security and defence to use pseudonyms in a statement of claim for a person's name and other material facts – where in the interests of Australia's national security and defence to prohibit or restrict the disclosure of certain information Legislation Cited: Court Suppression and Non-publication Orders Act 2010 (NSW), ss 3, 7, 8 Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), s 85B Criminal Code 1995 (Cth) s 93.2 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 50 Cases Cited: Alister v The Queen (1984) 154 CLR 404; [1984] HCA 85 Australian Broadcasting Commission v Parish (1980) 43 FLR 129; [1980] FCA 33 Binyam Mohamed v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (No 2) [2009] EWHC 152 Burmah Oil Co Ltd v Governor and Co of the Bank of England [1979] 3 WLR 722 Central Intelligence Agency v Sims (1985) 471 U.S 159 Church of Scientology Inc v Woodward (1982) 154 CLR 25 Conway v Rimmer [1968] AC 910 Fairfax Digital Australia and New Zealand Pty Ltd v Ibrahim (2012) 83 NSWLR 52; [2012] NSWCCA 125 Hamzy v R [2013] NSWCCA 156 John Fairfax Group Pty Ltd v Local Court (NSW) (1991) 26 NSWLR 131 Kamasaee v Commonwealth of Australia (No 4) (2016) 52 VR 368; [2016] VSC 492 Kamasaee v Commonwealth of Australia (No 6) (2016) 52; 368; [2016] VSC 605 Pelechowski v Registrar, Court of Appeal (NSW) (1999) 198 CLR 435; [1999] HCA 19 R (Mohamed) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (No 2) [2011] QB 218 R v Fandakis [2002] NSWCCA 5 R v Khazaal [2006] NSWSC 1061 R v Lewes Justices; Ex parte Home Secretary [1973] AC 388 R v Lodhi (2006) 199 FLR 270; [2006] NSWSC 596 R v Lodhi (2006) 65 NSWLR 573; [2006] NSWCCA 101 Sankey v Whitlam (1978) 142 CLR 1; [1978] HCA 43 Traljesic v Attorney-General of the Commonwealth of Australia (2006) 150 FCR 199; [2006] FCA 125 Traljesic v Attorney-General of the Commonwealth of Australia [2006] 150 FCR 199; [2006] FCA 125 Young v Quin (1984) 4 FCR 483 Texts Cited: Practice Note SC Gen 2 'Supreme Court- Access to Court' Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Person "A" (a pseudonym) (Plaintiff) The Commonwealth (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: D Dragicevic (Solicitor) (Plaintiff) A Berger (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate