Armand-Iskak v Attorney-General of New South Wales [2019] NSWCA 145

Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Armand-Iskak v Attorney-General of New South Wales [2019] NSWCA 145 Hearing dates: 13 June 2019 Decision date: 19 June 2019 Before: Basten JA at [1]; Macfarlan JA at [2]; White JA at [3] Decision: Summons for judicial review dismissed. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Judicial review of decision to dismiss application for inquiry into conviction or sentence under s 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) – Whether jurisdictional error or error of law established – Whether applicant raised any matter that had not previously been fully considered – Summons dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW), ss 75, 78, 79 Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 37 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), ss 48, 69 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 177 Cases Cited: Application of Armand-Iskak pursuant to s 78 Crime (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 [2018] NSWSC 928 Armand-Iskak v R [2014] NSWCCA 325 Buttrose v Attorney General for NSW (2015) 324 ALR 562; [2015] NSWCA 22 Ferella v Stomo [2017] NSWCA 268 Patsalis v Attorney General for NSW (2013) 85 NSWLR 463 Sinkovich v Attorney General (NSW) (2013) 85 NSWLR 783; [2013] NSWCA 383 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Sheon Armand-Iskak (Applicant) Attorney General for New South Wales (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Self-represented via AVL (Applicant) J Davidson with D Reynolds (Respondent)