NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Newling v Metlife Insurance Limited [2019] NSWCA 149 Hearing dates: 15 May 2019 Decision date: 21 June 2019 Before: Bell P at [1]; Leeming JA at [3]; Emmett AJA at [4] Decision: 1. Summons seeking leave to appeal dismissed. 2. Appeal dismissed. 3. The appellant pay the respondent's costs. Catchwords: INSURANCE - Total and permanent disablement - Whether the insurer acted fairly and reasonably in assessing and determining the Member's claim - Whether the insurer gave reasons for the determination - Whether there was an obligation for the insurer to give reasons for declining the Member's claim - Whether the insurer was in breach of its duty and obligations - Whether separate letters sent by the insurer should be treated as separate declinatures. Legislation Cited: Nil Cases Cited: Hanover Life Re of Australasia Ltd v Jones [2017] NSWCA 233 Hartigan Nominees Pty Ltd v Rydge (1992) 29 NSWLR 405 Hellessey v MetLife Insurance Limited [2017] NSWSC 1284 MetLife Insurance Ltd v Hellessey [2018] NSWCA 307 Newling v FSS Trustee Corporation (No 2) [2018] NSWSC 1405 Re Londonderry's Settlement [1965] Ch 918 TAL Life Ltd v Shuetrim (2016) 91 NSWLR 439 Tierney v King [1983] 2 Qd R 580 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Kim Newling (Appellant) Metlife Insurance Limited (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M J Gollan with A M Coombes (Appellant) J Sexton SC with S J Walsh (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate