NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Lal v Goonetilleke [2019] NSWLEC 1280 Hearing dates: 4 April 2019 Date of orders: 04 April 2019 Decision date: 04 April 2019 Jurisdiction: Class 2 Before: Douglas AC Decision: The Court orders: (1) Prune the root exposed in the lawn with a sharp saw, just inside the applicant's property. Remove the root from the lawn, and infill the resulting void with soil. This work is to be completed by an AQF level 3 arborist. (2) Remove the uplifted section of the rear court yard step, and replace so that the step is re-aligned to the original level and made safe. (3) The applicant is to obtain three quotes for each of these works. The respondents are to pay a sum equivalent to 50% of the least expensive of each three quotes for works that satisfy orders 1 & 2, within 21 days of receipt of paid invoices. (4) If these works are not completed within six months, these orders lapse. Catchwords: TREES (DISPUTES BETWEEN NEIGHBOURS) –damage to property – apprehension of further damage and injury – tree removal and compensation sought Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Cases Cited: Barker v Kyriakides [2007] NSWLEC 292 Granger v Owners Corporation SP 18494 [2012] NSWLEC 1285 Robson v Leischke (2008) 159 LGERA 280; [2008] NSWLEC 152 Smith & Hannaford v Zhang & Zhou [2011] NSWLEC 29 Yang v Scerri [2007] NSWLEC 592 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Praveen Lal (Applicant) Mark Goonetilleke (First Respondent) Stephanie Peiris (Second Respondent) Representation: P Lal, litigant in person (Applicant) M Goonetilleke, litigant in person (First Respondent) S Peiris, litigant in person (Second Respondent) File Number(s): 2018/379581 Publication restriction: No
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate