NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v KK [2018] NSWDC 506 Hearing dates: 22, 23, 24, 25 July 2018 Date of orders: 25 July 2018 Decision date: 25 July 2018 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: S Norrish QC DCJ Decision: Counts 1 and 2 on the indictment be separated from Counts 4 to 7. Catchwords: Interlocutory orders – admissibility of tendency evidence, separate trials. Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Cases Cited: IMM v The Queen [2016] HCA 14 Hughes v The Queen [2017] HCA 20 Ceissman v R [2015] NSWCCA 74 Pfenning v The Queen [1995] HCA 7; 182 CLR 461 JG v R [2014] NSWCCA 138 DSJ v R [2012] NSWCCA 9 Demirok [1976] V.R. 244 Webb & Hay v The Queen (1993-1994) 181 CLR 41 R v Dent [2016] NSWSC 99 R v Watkins [2005] NSWCCA 164 Saoud v R (2014) 87 NSWLR 481 BP v R [2010] NSWCCA 303 R v Carroll (2002) 213 CLR 635 R v RN [2005] NSWCCA 413 Bauer v The Queen (No.2) [2017] VSCA 176 RHB v The Queen [2011] VSCA 295 Jones v R [2014] NSWCCA 280 Mol v R [2017] NSWCCA 76 R v Shamouil [2006] NSWCCA 112 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) KK (Accused) Representation: Counsel: Mr R Kimbell (Crown) Mr Green (Accused)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate