NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: State of New South Wales v KML [2019] NSWSC 756 Hearing dates: 19 June 2019 Date of orders: 19 June 2019 Decision date: 19 June 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Garling J Decision: (1) Order, pursuant to s 5B and s 9(1A) of the Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006, that the Defendant be subject to an Extended Supervision Order for a period of five years from today.
(2) Order, pursuant to s 11 of the Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006, that the Defendant comply, for the period of the Extended Supervision Order, with each of the conditions set out in schedule A to the amended summons dated 19 June 2019. Catchwords: HIGH RISK OFFENDER – serious sex offender - extended supervision order – where parties have agreed that an ESO should be made – where the term of the ESO is in dispute – whether the court should impose a 2 year or 5 year ESO – what test the court should apply to fix the term of an ESO – whether there is a statutory obligation to impose the minimum necessary term for an ESO to be in place Legislation Cited: Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 Cases Cited: Wilde v State of New South Wales [2015] NSWCA 28 Texts Cited: Not Applicable Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: State of New South Wales (P) KML (D) Representation: Counsel: D. New (P) R. Wilson (D)
Solicitors: Crown Solicitor's Office (P) Legal Aid NSW (D) File Number(s): 2019/30906 Publication restriction: Not Applicable
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate