NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: IAG Ltd t/as NRMA Insurance v Chahoud [2019] NSWSC 767 Hearing dates: 13 June 2019 Date of orders: 24 June 2019 Decision date: 24 June 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Bell P Decision: 1. Pursuant to r 59.10(2) of the UCPR, extend the time for the plaintiff to commence these proceedings to 7 January 2019.
2. Set aside the decisions of the proper officer of the second defendant made on 9 July 2018 and 8 October 2018 dismissing the plaintiff's application under s 62 of the Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW) for a further medical assessment.
3. Remit the matter to the second defendant for the determination of the plaintiff's application by a proper officer according to law.
4. The first defendant is to pay the plaintiff's costs. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – defendant injured in motor accident – plaintiff applied for further medical assessment of degree of permanent impairment of defendant – proper officer dismissed plaintiff's application – plaintiff requested that proper officer reconsider decision – proper officer found no reason to reconsider decision – plaintiff sought judicial review of proper officer's decisions – whether proper officer applied wrong legal test – whether proper officer misconstrued applicable guidelines – whether pre-impairment injury or records of pre-impairment injury must exist "at the time of the accident" – whether proper officer wrongly determined for herself issues properly for expert opinion – whether Court should in any event exercise its discretion to decline to grant relief
CIVIL PROCEDURE – plaintiff's summons filed out of time in respect of proper officer's first decision but not second decision – whether extension of time should be granted in respect of first decision – where delay explained by exhaustion of remedies below – where second decision inextricably linked to first decision – where defendant accepted there would be no prejudice Legislation Cited: Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW) ss 62, 131 Cases Cited: Al Maha Pty Ltd v Huajun Investments Pty Ltd [2018] NSWCA 137 Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd v MacKenzie [2012] NSWSC 1458; 62 MVR 305 Dominice v Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd [2017] NSWCA 171; 81 MVR 249 Henderson v QBE Insurance (Australia) Ltd [2013] NSWCA 480; 66 MVR 69 IAG in IAG Ltd t/as NRMA Insurance v Jammal [2019] NSWSC 676 Jubb v Insurance Australia Ltd [2016] NSWCA 153; 76 MVR 228 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Sabharwal [2018] FCAFC 160 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259; [1996] HCA 6 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Bhardwaj (2002) 209 CLR 597; [2002] HCA 11 QBE Insurance (Australia) Ltd v Miller [2013] NSWCA 442; 67 MVR 322 R v Kelly; Ex parte Victorian Chamber of Manufactures (1953) 88 CLR 285; [1953] HCA 30 Rodger v De Gelder (2011) 80 NSWLR 594; [2011] NSWCA 97 Rodriguez v Telstra Corp Ltd [2002] FCA 30; 66 ALD 579 Tomko v Palasty (No 2) (2007) 71 NSWLR 61; [2007] NSWCA 369 Category: Principal judgment Parties: IAG Ltd t/as NRMA Insurance (Plaintiff) Walid Chahoud (First Defendant) State Insurance Regulatory Authority (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: M Robinson SC, J Gumbert (Plaintiff) S Blount (First Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate