NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Taouk v Ho [2019] NSWCA 156 Hearing dates: 4 June 2019 Decision date: 27 June 2019 Before: Gleeson JA at [1] Emmett AJA at [59] Decision: Summons seeking leave to appeal is dismissed with costs. Catchwords: APPEAL – leave to appeal – building and construction dispute – appeal from Local Court to Supreme Court on a question of law – primary judge found that respondent not bound by releases and bars to action in the settlement deed – where deed delivered to applicant's solicitors – where applicant disclaimed deed without executing it – whether injustice to applicant in refusing leave to appeal Legislation Cited: Local Court Act 2007 (NSW), ss 39(1), 40(2)(c) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 101(2)(r) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 42.1, 50.11 Cases Cited: Ansett Transport Industries (Operations) Pty Ltd v Comptroller of Stamps [1985] VR 70 Baulkham Hills Private Hospital Pty Ltd v G R Securities Pty Ltd (1986) 40 NSWLR 622 Be Financial Pty Ltd as Trustee for Be Financial Operations Trust v Das [2012] NSWCA 164 Beesly v Hallwood Estates Limited [1961] Ch 105 Chief Commissioner of State Revenue v Smeaton Grange Holdings Pty Ltd [2017] NSWCA 184 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Taylor (1929) 42 CLR 80 G R Securities Pty Ltd v Baulkham Hills Private Hospital Pty Ltd (1986) 40 NSWLR 631 Jaycar Pty Ltd v Lombardo [2011] NSWCA 284 Mallot v Wilson [1903] 2 Ch 494 Masters v Cameron (1954) 91 CLR 353; [1954] HCA 72 Mirzikinian v Tom & Bill Waterhouse Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 296 Monarch Petroleum NL v Citco Australia Petroleum Ltd [1986] WAR 310 Naas (Lady) v Westminster Bank Ltd [1940] AC 366 Re Paradise Motor Co Ltd [1968] 2 All ER 625; [1968] 1 WLR 1125 Secretary, Department of Family and Community Services v Smith (2017) 95 NSWLR 597; [2017] NSWCA 206 Segboer v A J Richardson Properties Pty Ltd [2012] NSWCA 253 Sinclair, Scott & Co v Naughton (1929) 43 CLR 310; [1929] HCA 34 Smeaton Grange Holdings Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2016] NSWSC 1594 Wilson v Frost [1935] 35 SR (NSW) 521 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Joseph Taouk (Applicant) Yuen Min Ho (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr I G Roberts SC / Mr R Wathukarage (Applicant) Mr R Freeman (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate