NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited v James (No 3) [2019] NSWSC 832 Hearing dates: 20 and 21 June 2019 Decision date: 05 July 2019 Jurisdiction: Equity - Commercial List Before: Ball J Decision: The defendant's notice of motion filed on 19 September 2017 is dismissed with costs Catchwords: JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS – Amending, varying and setting aside – Fraud, misrepresentation or suppressions of material fact – whether to set aside judgment by consent – whether misleading and deceptive conduct by plaintiff – discretionary considerations – whether defendant has arguable defence – delay – whether delay in advancing case of misleading and deceptive conduct disentitles defendant to relief MISLEADING AND DECEPTIVE CONDUCT – Australian Consumer Law – silence – whether reasonable expectation of being informed of information concerning activities of receivers – whether disclosure required by terms of guarantee – whether reasonable expectation of disclosure of other matters – reliance – whether defendant relied on absence of that information – whether knowledge of that information would have led defendant to not accept judgment by consent CORPORATIONS – Receivers and managers – duties – s 420A of Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – whether arguable defence based on this provision – scope and function of s 420A – rights of guarantors – standard imposed on receivers – exclusion by contract Legislation Cited: Australian Consumer Law Australian Securities and Investment Commission Act 2001 (Cth) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Buckeridge v Mercantile Credits Ltd (1981) 147 CLR 654; [1981] HCA 62 Campbell v Backoffice Investments Pty Ltd (2009) 238 CLR 304; [2009] HCA 25 Coles v Burke (1987) 10 NSWLR 429 Demagogue Pty Ltd v Ramensky (1992) 39 FCR 31; [1992] FCA 851 Dimitrovski v Australian Executor Trustees Limited [2013] NSWSC 337 Fabcot Pty Ltd v Port Macquarie-Hastings Council [2011] NSWCA 167 GE Capital Australia v Davis (2002) 180 FLR 250; [2002] NSWSC 1146 Harvey v Phillips (1956) 95 CLR 235 In the matter of Wine National Pty Ltd, James Estate Wines Pty Ltd, Liquor National Pty Ltd [2014] NSWSC 507 James v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (2018) 97 NSWLR 663; [2018] NSWCA 41 Kendell v Carnegie (2006) 68 NSWLR 193; [2006] NSWCA 302 Miller & Associates Insurance Broking Pty Ltd v BMW Australia Finance Ltd (2010) 241 CLR 357; [2010] HCA 31 OXS Pty Ltd v Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority [2016] NSWCA 120 The Owners-Strata Plan No 57164 v Yau (2017) 96 NSWLR 587; [2017] NSWCA 341 Xenos v National Australia Bank Ltd & Anor [2007] NSWSC 973 Texts Cited: Code of Banking Practice Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited (ABN 11 005 347 522) (Plaintiff | Respondent) David Anthony James (Defendant | Applicant) Representation: Counsel: IM Jackman SC with R Foreman (Plaintiff | Respondent) D Pritchard SC with J Baird and N Condylis (Defendant | Applicant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate