NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Coplin v Al Maha Pty Ltd [2019] NSWCA 159 Hearing dates: 7 May 2019 Date of orders: 02 July 2019 Decision date: 02 July 2019 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1], Leeming JA at [2], Payne JA at [3] Decision: (1) Notice of motion seeking leave to amend the notice of appeal dated 3 May 2019 dismissed. (2) Appeal dismissed. (3) Appellant to pay the respondents' costs as agreed or assessed. Catchwords: LAND LAW – conveyancing – options – call options – construction – notice of exercise of option able to be given to grantor's conveyancer – whether option validly exercised - whether notice to grantee required that conveyancer no longer retained by grantor – whether requirement that conveyancer be retained at the time of the exercise of the option Legislation Cited: Contracts Review Act 1980 (NSW), s 7 Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), s 170(1)(b) Uniform Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 14.11 Cases Cited: Austra Tanks Pty Ltd v Running [1982] 2 NSWLR 840 Australian Broadcasting Commission v Australian Performing Right Association Ltd (1973) 129 CLR 99; [1973] HCA 36 Bahr v Nicolay (No 2) (1988) 164 CLR 604; [1998] HCA 16 Comdox v Robins [2009] NSWSC 367 Coulton v Holcombe (1986) 162 CLR 1; [1986] HCA 33 Hagerty v Hills Central Pty Ltd [2018] NSWCA 200 HP Mercantile Pty Ltd v Hartnett [2016] NSWCA 342 Josland v Mullaley Properties Pty Ltd (1993) 6 BPR 13,285 Ma v Adams [2015] NSWSC 1452 Meehan v Jones (1982) 149 CLR 571; [1982] HCA 52 Mount Bruce Mining Pty Ltd v Wright Prospecting Pty Ltd (2015) 256 CLR 104; [2015] HCA 37 Multicon Engineering Pty Ltd v Federal Airports Corp (1997) 47 NSWLR 631 Pratt & Anor v Hawkins (No 2) (1991) NSW ConvR 55-592 Suttor v Gundowda Pty Ltd (1950) 81 CLR 418; [1950] HCA 35 Tonitto v Bassal (1992) 28 NSWLR 564 Upper Hunter County District Council v Australian Chilling and Freezing Co Ltd (1968) 118 CLR 429; [1968] HCA 8 Whisprun Pty Ltd v Dixon [2003] HCA 48; 77 ALJR 1598 Texts Cited: JD Heydon QC, Heydon on Contract (Thomson Reuters, 2019) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Iraklis Gary Coplin (Appellant) Al Maha Pty Ltd (ACN 118 230 087) (First Respondent) Sophia Norma Bechara (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P Gray SC, B Oliak (Appellant) T M Faulkner SC, A F Garsia (Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate