NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Environment Protection Authority v Newcastle Port Corporation [2019] NSWLEC 92 Hearing dates: 13 May and 17 June 2019 Date of orders: 28 June 2019 Decision date: 28 June 2019 Jurisdiction: Class 5 Before: Robson J Decision: See orders at [69] Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – subpoena filed by defendant seeking production of draft reports prepared by expert retained by prosecutor – prosecutor claimed privilege over and objected to access being given to draft reports on the grounds of legal professional privilege – whether draft reports privileged – whether privilege waived – privilege claim upheld and access not granted Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) ss 117, 118, 119, 122, 126, 131A, 142 Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 (NSW) s 120 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 33.8 Cases Cited: Buzzle Operations v Apple Computer Australia (2009) 74 NSWLR 469; [2009] NSWSC 225 Hancock v Rinehart (Privilege) [2016] NSWSC 12 Hartogen Energy Ltd (in liq) v Australian Gas Light Co (1992) 36 FCR 557; [1992] FCA 322 Lubeck v NSW Police Force [2019] NSWSC 504 Mann v Carnell (1999) 201 CLR 1; [1999] HCA 66 ML Ubase Holdings Co Ltd v Trigem Computer Inc (2007) 69 NSWLR 577; [2007] NSWSC 859 New Cap Reinsurance Corporation Ltd (in liq) v Renaissance Reinsurance Ltd [2007] NSWSC 258 Shea v TruEnergy Services Pty Ltd (No 5) [2013] FCA 937; (2013) 303 ALR 230 Sugden v Sugden (2007) 70 NSWLR 301; [2007] NSWCA 312 Sydney Airports Corporation Ltd v Singapore Airlines Ltd & Qantas Airways [2005] NSWCA 47 Tavcol Pty Ltd v Valbeet Pty Ltd [2016] NSWSC 1002 Towney v Minister for Land & Water Conservation (NSW) (1997) 76 FCR 401 Traderight (NSW) Pty Ltd v Bank of Queensland Ltd (No 14) [2013] NSWSC 211 Texts Cited: NSW Department of Premier & Cabinet Memorandum M1997-26 Litigation Involving Government Authorities Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Environment Protection Authority (Prosecutor) Newcastle Port Corporation (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Z Heger (Prosecutor) C R Ireland (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate