NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: State of New South Wales v BP (No. 2) [2019] NSWSC 806 Hearing dates: 3 and 20 June 2019 Date of orders: 28 June 2019 Decision date: 28 June 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Wright J Decision: 1. Pursuant to ss 27 and 28(1) of the Terrorism (High Risk Offenders) Act 2017, the defendant is subject to an interim supervision order (ISO) for a period of 28 days from the date of this order. 2. Pursuant to s 29 of the Terrorism (High Risk Offenders) Act 2017, the defendant is directed, for the period of the ISO, to comply with the conditions set out in the schedule to these orders. 3. The parties have liberty to approach the High Risk Offender List Judge for directions and a hearing date for the final hearing of this matter. Catchwords: HIGH RISK OFFENDER – Terrorism (High Risk Offenders) Act 2017 (NSW) – application for interim supervision order – appropriate conditions Legislation Cited: Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) Mental Health Act 2007 (NSW) Terrorism (High Risk Offenders) Act 2017 (NSW) Cases Cited: State of New South Wales v BP (Preliminary) [2019] NSWSC 699 State of New South Wales v Golding (Preliminary) [2018] NSWSC 1041 Wilde v State of New South Wales [2015] NSWCA 28; 249 A Crim R 65 Category: Principal judgment Parties: State of New South Wales (Plaintiff) BP (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Ms K Richardson SC and Mr S Dametto (Plaintiff) Ms F Graham (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate