NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: State of New South Wales v Williamson (No. 1) [2019] NSWSC 812 Hearing dates: 26 June 2019 Date of orders: 02 July 2019 Decision date: 02 July 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Davies J Decision: Summons dismissed. Catchwords: HIGH RISK OFFENDER – preliminary hearing – application for interim supervision order – serious sex offender – defendant currently subject to extended supervision order – whether the defendant poses an unacceptable risk of committing a serious offence if not kept under supervision - where the defendant had complied with all the conditions of his existing ESO – where the defendant demonstrated insight into his ongoing need for pharmaceutical, psychiatric and psychological treatment – where the only risk assessment conducted in the last four years rated the defendant's risk of reoffending as average and recommended that no further application be made – application dismissed. Legislation Cited: Child Protection (Offenders Prohibition Orders) Act 2004 (NSW) Child Protection (Offenders Registration) Act 2000 (NSW) s 8 Court Suppression and Non-publication Orders Act 2010 (NSW) s 10 Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) ss 5B, 5D, 5I, 7, 9, 10A Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990 (NSW) Terrorism (High Risk Offenders) Act 2017 (NSW) Cases Cited: Attorney General for New South Wales v McGuire by his tutor Thompson [2019] NSWSC 76 Attorney General for New South Wales v Tillman [2007] NSWCA 119 Lynn v State of New South Wales (2016) 91 NSWLR 636; [2016] NSWCA 57 State of NSW v Ceissman [2018] NSWSC 508 State of NSW v Clarke [2019] NSWSC 411 State of New South Wales v Simcock (Final) [2016] NSWSC 1805 State of New South Wales v Thomas (Preliminary) [2011] NSWSC 118 State of New South Wales v Williamson [2014] NSWSC 519 State of New South Wales v Williamson [2014] NSWSC 939 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: State of New South Wales (Plaintiff) Terry John Williamson (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: J Single (Plaintiff) J Stratton SC & T Hennessy (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate