NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Fitzpatrick (No 2) [2019] NSWSC 836 Hearing dates: 1; 2 July 2019 Date of orders: 02 July 2019 Decision date: 02 July 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Campbell J Decision: 1. The material constituting Exhibit Voir Dire 1 is admissible; 2. The nail package depicted the in photographs annexed to Exhibit Voir Dire 4 is admissible. Catchwords: ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE – determining admissibility of "bomb documents bundle" and nail package – assumption as to admissibility that evidence will be accepted – circumstantial nature of case – whether evidence which may be weak in isolation may form cogent part of Crown case when taken with other circumstances – held evidence admitted.
TENDENCY EVIDENCE – whether evidence that is capable of being seen as tendency evidence requires the evidence be dealt with for admissibility purposes as tendency evidence – held evidence going to state of mind of accused is not always tendency evidence – held evidence capable of satisfying the jury that certain items were in the accused's possession may admissible as to state-of-mind of accused.
MISUSE OF EVIDENCE – misuse of evidence - whether in admitting evidence there is a danger that a jury may give undue weight to evidence for purposes other than the reasons for which it was admitted – held such risk can be mitigated through appropriate directions to jury and by providing the proper approach required for deciding a circumstantial case – evidence admitted. Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 94 – 101 Cases Cited: Burrel v Regina [2009] NSWCCA 163; 196 ACrim R 199 Chamberlain v The Queen (No 2) (1993) 179 CLR 44; [1993] HCA 71 Elomar v R; Hasan v R; Cheikho v R; Jamal v R [2014] NSWCCA 303 The Queen v Hillier (2007) 228 CLR 618; [2007] HCA 13 Strachan v R [2017] NSWCCA 322 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina (Crown) Paul John Fitzpatrick (Accused) Representation: Counsel: J. Tunks (Crown) D. Price (Accused)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate