NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Inner West Council v Findlay [2019] NSWLEC 96 Hearing dates: 12 and 13 June 2019 Date of orders: 23 August 2019 Decision date: 23 August 2019 Jurisdiction: Class 4 Before: Moore J Decision: See undertakings and orders at [84] and [85] Catchwords: ORDERS - enforcement - discretion - balancing of factors as to whether appropriate to require compliance - undertakings offered by Respondent - undertakings appropriate to circumstances - discretion exercised not to enforce orders - summons dismissed - presumption that costs follow the event - no basis to depart from that presumption - costs ordered in favour of Respondent Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979 Evidence Act 1995, ss 91 and 93 Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 56A Local Government Act 1993, ss 124, 180, 673, 676 and 735A Local Government (Council Amalgamations) Proclamation 2016 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 42.1 Cases Cited: Findlay v Ashfield Council [2016] NSWLEC 1219 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 P E Bakers v Yehuda Pty Ltd (1988) 15 NSWLR 437 Warringah Shire Council v Sedevcic (1987) 10 NSWLR 335 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Inner West Council (Applicant) Eric Findlay (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr S Nash, barrister (Applicant) Ms S Duggan SC/Ms J Reid, barrister (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate