NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: AH v R [2019] NSWCCA 152 Hearing dates: 4 February 2019 Decision date: 09 July 2019 Before: Simpson AJA at [1]; Button J at [75]; Lonergan J at [76] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal against conviction granted;
(2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME – conviction appeal – where applicant convicted of six counts of aggravated indecent assault but acquitted on two counts – where jury returned mixed verdicts on two counts which involved conduct that occurred in close proximity in time – whether mixed verdicts irreconcilably inconsistent – whether verdicts of guilty unreasonable and not supported by evidence Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 61J Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), ss 294B, 306U Jury Act 1977 (NSW) Cases Cited: Jafary v R [2018] NSWCCA 243 Jones v The Queen (1997) 191 CLR 439; [1997] HCA 56 M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487; [1994] HCA 63 MacKenzie v The Queen (1996) 190 CLR 348; [1996] HCA 35 MFA v The Queen (2002) 213 CLR 606; [2002] HCA 53 R v Markuleski (2001) 52 NSWLR 82; [2001] NSWCCA 290 SKA v The Queen (2011) 243 CLR 400; [2011] HCA 13 The Queen v Baden-Clay (2016) 258 CLR 308; [2016] HCA 35 Category: Principal judgment Parties: AH (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: F Coyne/W Shukoor (Applicant) B Baker (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate