NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Flynn v PPK Mining Equipment Pty Ltd [2019] NSWSC 851 Hearing dates: 5 July 2019 Decision date: 10 July 2019 Jurisdiction: Equity - Commercial List Before: Ball J Decision: The defendants' amended notice of motion filed on 5 July 2019 is dismissed with costs Catchwords: COSTS – Security for costs – Relevant factors and discretion – multiple plaintiffs – whether risk of different costs orders being made with respect to different plaintiffs – quantum Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Cases Cited: Brecher v Barrack Investments Pty Ltd [2018] FCA 472 Fiduciary Ltd v Morningstar Research Pty Ltd [2004] NSWSC 664; (2004) 208 ALR 564 Harpur v Ariadne Australia Limited (No 2) [1984] 2 Qd R 523; (1984) 8 ACLR 835 Maples v Hughes [2002] NSWSC 617 Street v Luna Park Sydney Pty Ltd [2006] NSWSC 1317 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Daniel Flynn (First Plaintiff) Flynfam Pty Limited as trustee for Flynn Family Trust (Second Plaintiff | Respondent) PPK Mining Equipment Pty Ltd (First Defendant | First Applicant) PPK Group Limited (Second Defendant | Second Applicant) Representation: Counsel: A Justice (Second Plaintiff | Respondent) A J Bulley (Defendants | Applicants)
Solicitors: MRM Lawyers (Second Plaintiff | Respondent) Moray & Agnew (Defendants | Applicants) File Number(s): 2019/11615
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate