NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Wen v Mazda Australia Pty Limited [2019] NSWCATAP 169 Hearing dates: 18 June 2019 Date of orders: 10 July 2019 Decision date: 10 July 2019 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: P Durack SC, Senior Member D Goldstein, Senior Member Decision: 1. Leave to Appeal is refused.
2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CONSUMER CLAIM – Section 54 of the Australian Consumer Law – challenge to acceptance of expert opinion – no competing expert opinion – onus of proof not satisfied – no appellable error shown Legislation Cited: Australian Consumer Law Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Uniform Civil Procedural Rules 2005 Cases Cited: John Prendergast & Vanessa Prendergast v Western Murray Irrigation Ltd [2014] NSWCATAP 69 Texts Cited: None cited Category: Principal judgment Parties: Lixia Wen (Appellant) Mazda Australia Pty Limited and West End Motor Group Pty Ltd (Respondents) Representation: L Wen (Appellant self-represented) Mazda Australia Pty Limited and West End Motor Group Pty Ltd (Respondents self-represented) File Number(s): AP 19/16294 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: New South Wales Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Citation: Not applicable Date of Decision: 07 March 2019 Before: P Boyce, Senior Member File Number(s): MV 18/29377
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate