NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Ekes v Hyde Page (No 2) [2019] NSWCA 169 Hearing dates: 9 July 2019 Date of orders: 09 July 2019 Decision date: 09 July 2019 Before: Bell P; Payne JA Decision: 1. Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs; 2. Applicant's motion seeking a stay dated 19 June 2019 dismissed with costs; 3. The Court orders costs be paid by Mr Ekes in a lump sum in the amount of $7,500 under s 98(4) of the Civil Procedure Act. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – Court of Appeal – application for leave to appeal – judgment or order of the Court in a Division for the winding up of a corporation – where debt alleged to have been paid prior to appointment of liquidator – application dismissed Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 98 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 95A, 459A, 459C Legal Profession Uniform Law (NSW) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 101 Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth), s 8AAZLGA, Sch 1 s 255-5 Cases Cited: Buckland Products Pty Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2003] VSCA 85 Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Begonia Pty Ltd (1993) 11 ACLC 1075 Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Guy Holdings Pty Ltd [1994] TASSC 126; 116 FLR 314; 14 ACSR 580 Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v De Simone Consulting Pty Limited [2007] FCA 548 Distinctive FX 9 Pty Ltd v Statewide Developments Pty Limited [2012] NSWCA 393 Expile Pty Limited v Jabb's Excavations Pty Limited [2003] NSWCA 163; 45 ACSR 711 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Futuris Corporation Ltd (2008) 237 CLR 146; [2008] HCA 32 Huang v Hua Cheng International Group Pty Ltd [2019] NSWCA 155 In the matter of Day & Night Online Transport Pty Ltd (in liq) [2018] NSWSC 796 Penson v Titan National Pty Ltd [2015] NSWCA 165 Pentelow v Bell Lawyers Pty Ltd [2018] NSWCA 150 Zervas v Burkitt [2019] NSWCA 112 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Paul Ekes (Applicant) GHS Safety Products Australia Pty Ltd (in liq) (First Respondent) John Hyde Page (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Ms T Wong (Applicant) Mr J Hyde Page (Second Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate