NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Miskelly v Roads and Maritime Services [2019] NSWCATAD 133 Hearing dates: 29 January 2019 Date of orders: 10 July 2019 Decision date: 10 July 2019 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: S Higgins, Senior Member Decision: (1) The decision of the respondent in regard to Documents 1, 2, 3, S1 and S3 is affirmed.
(2) The applicant's application is otherwise dismissed. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – access to government information – cabinet information
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – whether the Tribunal has jurisdiction to review a decision of an agency that information is 'out of scope' Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (NSW) Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 (NSW) Cases Cited: D'Adam v New South Wales Treasury [2014] NSWCATAD 68 Fisse v Secretary, Department of the Treasury [2008] FCAFC 188 Flack v Commissioner of Police, New South Police [2011] NSWADT 286 Hurst v Wagga Wagga City Council [2011] NSWADT 307 Ku-ring-gai Council v NSW Department of Premier and Cabinet [2016] NSWCATAD 181 Robinson v Transport for NSW; Robinson v Roads and Maritime Services [2017] NSWCATAD 353 Transport for NSW v Robinson [2018] NSWCATAP 123 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Greg Miskelly (Applicant) Roads and Maritime Services (First Respondent) Premier of NSW (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: D Birch (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate