NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Hamamdjian v Lipovac [2019] NSWCA 170 Hearing dates: 8 July 2019 Date of orders: 11 July 2019 Decision date: 11 July 2019 Before: Basten JA at [1]; Leeming JA at [52]; McCallum JA at [53] Decision: 1. Dismiss the appeal.
2. Order the appellant to pay the respondent's costs of the appeal. Catchwords: APPEAL – civil – challenge to findings of fact – whether trial judge erred in accepting evidence of defendant – resolution of inconsistencies – absence of independent witnesses – plaintiff bore onus of proof – judge entitled to have regard to inherent implausibility of plaintiff's case
TORTS – negligence – liability for motor accident – vehicles travelling in adjoining lanes – liability dependent on whether defendant travelling straight ahead from right turn only lane Cases Cited: Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118; [2003] HCA 22 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Haig Hamamdjian (Appellant) Mary Elizabeth Lipovac (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr M Daley (Appellant) Mr A Black SC/Ms C Allen (Respondent)
Solicitors: Brydens Lawyers (Appellant) Moray & Agnew (Respondent) File Number(s): 2018/393344 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court Jurisdiction: Civil Date of Decision: 7 December 2018 Before: Sidis ADCJ File Number(s): 2015/142705
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate