NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Piao v R [2019] NSWCCA 154 Hearing dates: 3 May 2019 Decision date: 12 July 2019 Before: Basten JA at [1]; R A Hulme J at [12]; Fagan J at [48] Decision: 1. Extension of time to file Notice of Application for Leave to Appeal to 19 December 2018 granted. 2. Leave to appeal granted. 3. Appeal against sentence dismissed. Catchwords: SENTENCING — appeal against sentence — co-offenders — disparity between sentences – whether legitimate sense of grievance arising from disparity – assessment of disparity based on objective criteria – consideration of basis upon which co-offenders sentenced – differences in statements of agreed facts and subjective cases between applicant and co-offenders – no justifiable grievance assessed by reference to objective criteria – leave to appeal granted – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 93T Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW), s 25(2) Cases Cited: Baquiran v R [2014] NSWCCA 221 Fenech v R [2018] NSWCCA 160 Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 462; [2011] HCA 49 Lowe v The Queen (1984) 154 CLR 606; [1984] HCA 46 Nasiri v R [2019] NSWCCA 16 PG v R [2017] NSWCCA 179 R v Yiu; R v Yau [2018] NSWCCA 155 Wright (a pseudonym) v R [2017] NSWCCA 289 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jian Piao (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr M Mantaj (Applicant) Ms H Roberts (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate