NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Beagley v R [2019] NSWCCA 155 Hearing dates: 8 May 2019 Decision date: 17 July 2019 Before: White JA at [1]; Harrison J at [2]; R A Hulme J at [3] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal granted. 2. Dismiss the appeal. Catchwords: CRIME — appeals — appeal against sentence – firearms offences committed in 2011 – sentenced for offences related to possession of firearms in 2012 – sentenced for offences of firing of firearm with disregard for safety of others and causing grievous bodily harm offences in 2018 – no error established where submissions on sentence made in respect of delay and principle of totality – judges are not required to approach sentencing in arithmetical fashion – no error established in relation to concurrency and accumulation of offences – offences contain discrete and additional criminality compared to possession of firearm offences – sentence not manifestly excessive – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 54, 93G(1)(c) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Firearms Act 1996 (NSW), s 7(1) Cases Cited: Cahyadi v R [2007] NSWCCA 1; 168 A Crim R 41 JM v R [2014] NSWCCA 297; (2014) 246 A Crim R 528 Mill v The Queen (1988) 166 CLR 59; [1988] HCA 70 R v XX [2009] NSWCCA 115; 195 A Crim R 38 Sabra v R [2015] NSWCCA 38 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Cory Dean Beagley (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Ms J Paingakulam (Applicant) Ms K Jeffreys (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate