NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Amagwula v R [2019] NSWCCA 156 Hearing dates: 8 February 2019 Decision date: 19 July 2019 Before: Basten JA at [1]; Button J at [68]; Lonergan at [407] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal to argue ground 2 granted. (2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME – appeal against conviction – supply of prohibited drugs – unrepresented accused at trial – pleas of not guilty not personally entered by accused on arraignment before the jury panel – whether trial a nullity as a result – whether trial so unfair as to constitute a miscarriage of justice – both grounds dismissed Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), ss 5, 6 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), ss 16, 20, 130, 154, 155, 157 Criminal Procedure Amendment (Pre-Trial Disclosure) Act 2001 (NSW), s 63A Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW), ss 25, 29 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 138 Cases Cited: Caruso v R [2012] VSCA 138 Dupas v The Queen (2010) 241 CLR 237 Fell v Chenhall [2018] NSWSC 1574 Fell v Chenhall [2018] NSWCA 260 Frawley (1993) 69 A Crim R 208 Gallagher v The Queen (1986) 160 CLR 392; [1986] HCA 26 GG v The Queen (2010) 79 NSWLR 194; [2010] NSWCCA 230 Gilbert v The Queen (2000) 201 CLR 414; [2000] HCA 15 Gould v Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) [2018] NSWCCA 109 Hughes v R (2015) 93 NSWLR 474; [2015] NSWCCA330 Kamm v R [2007] NSWCCA 201 Libke v R (2007) 230 CLR 559; [2007] HCA 30 MacPherson v R (1981) 147 CLR 512 Murphy v The Queen (1989) 167 CLR 94; [1989] HCA 28 Nudd v The Queen [2006] HCA 9; (2006) 80 ALJR 614 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355; [1998] HCA 28 Reg v Ellis (1973) 57 Cr App R 571 Reg v Williams [1976] 1 QB 373 R v Apostilides [1984] HCA 38; (1984) 154 CLR 563; R v Birlut (1995) NSWLR 1 R v Boyle [1954] 2 QB 292 R v Ellis (1973) 57 Cr App Rep 571 R v Halmi (2005) 62 NSWLR 262; [2005] NSWCCA 2 R v Heyes [1950] 2 All ER 587 R v Janceski (2005) 64 NSWLR 10; [2005] NSWCCA 281 R v Kepple [2007] EWCA Crim 1339 R v Nicolaidis (1994) 33 NSWLR 364 R v Talia [1996] 1 VR 462 R v Williams (Roy) (1977) 64 Cr App Rep 106; [1978] QB 373 Van Beelen v The Queen (2017) 91 ALJR 1244; [2017] HCA 48 Texts Cited: Halsbury's Laws of England, vol 27 LexisNexis Butterworths, Criminal Practice & Procedure NSW Sir James Fitzjames Stephen, A History of the Criminal Law of England (1883, Macmillan and Co), vol 1 Sir Stephen Mitchell QC, Archbold: Criminal Pleading, Evidence & Practice (67th ed, 2019, Thomson Reuters) Watson, Blackmore and Hosking, Criminal Law New South Wales William Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England (2016, Oxford University Press) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Chidi Gozie Amagwula (Appellant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: E Ozen SC (Appellant) H Roberts (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate