NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Marwan v Director of Public Prosecutions [2019] NSWCCA 161 Hearing dates: 11 July 2019 Date of orders: 11 July 2019 Decision date: 18 July 2019 Before: Leeming JA at [1]; R A Hulme J at [78]; Adamson J at [79] Decision: 1. Grant leave to appeal. 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – stay of proceedings – temporary stay – applicant charged with sexual intercourse without consent – main issue at trial consent – ambulance officer made note concerning complainant's history "ANXIETY, DEPRESSION - OFF MEDICATION FOR 4/12 SINCE -> AUSTRALIA" – complainant resident of United Kingdom – applicant sought stay pending prosecution making inquiries of complainant's mental health and obtaining records of diagnosis and treatment – stay refused by primary judge – consideration of nature of duty of disclosure – consideration of circumstances when duty extended to duty to make inquiries – nature of evidentiary onus upon applicant for a stay – no obligation to make inquiries in present case – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 61I Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5F Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), Chapter 6, Part 5, Division 2 Director of Public Prosecutions Act 1986 (NSW), s 14 Legal Profession Uniform Conduct (Barristers) Rules 2015, rr 87, 88, 89, 90 Cases Cited: AJ v R (2011) 32 VR 614; [2011] VSCA 215 Commissioner of State Revenue v ACN 005 057 349 Pty Ltd (2017) 261 CLR 509; [2017] HCA 6 Dietrich v The Queen (1992) 177 CLR 292; [1992] HCA 57 Eastman v Director of Public Prosecutions (No 13) [2016] ACTCA 65 Gould v Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) [2018] NSWCCA 109; 359 ALR 142 Hegarty v Queensland Ambulance Service [2007] QCA 366 LAL v The Queen [2011] VSCA 111 Leiper v R [2018] NSWCCA 117 Mallard v The Queen (2005) 224 CLR 125; [2005] HCA 68 R v Brown (Winston) [1998] AC 367 R v Garofalo [1999] 2 VR 625; [1998] VSCA 145 R v Grey [2000] NSWCCA 46; 111 A Crim R 314 R v Keane [1994] 1 WLR 746 R v Lipton (2011) 82 NSWLR 123; [2011] NSWCCA 247 R v Reardon (No 2) (2004) 60 NSWLR 454; [2004] NSWCCA 197 R v Seller; R v McCarthy (2015) 89 NSWLR 155; [2015] NSWCCA 76 R v Spiteri (2004) 61 NSWLR 369; [2004] NSWCCA 321 Re K [2002] NSWCCA 374 State of New South Wales v Briggs (2016) 95 NSWLR 467; [2016] NSWCA 344 Strickland v Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions [2018] HCA 53; 93 ALJR 1 The Queen v K (1991) 161 LSJS 135 Texts Cited: Department of Public Prosecution, Prosecution Guidelines, Guideline 18 "Disclosure" Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mirco Marwan (Applicant) Director of Public Prosecutions (Respondent) Representation: Counsel:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate