NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: State of New South Wales v Doherty (Final) [2019] NSWSC 920 Hearing dates: 1, 29 March 2019 Decision date: 19 July 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Ierace J Decision: (1) Pursuant to ss 5B and 9(1)(a) of the Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW), the defendant be subject to an extended supervision order for a period of 12 months from 28 July 2019.
(2) Pursuant to s 11 of the Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW), for the period of the extended supervision order, the defendant is directed to comply with the conditions set out in the Schedule to these orders. Catchwords: HIGH RISK OFFENDER – final hearing – application for extended supervision order – interim supervision order previously made – whether unacceptable risk of committing another serious violent or sexual offence – drug use primary risk factor – 12 month extended supervision order imposed with conditions Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) Cases Cited: Doherty v R [2006] NSWCCA 133 Lynn v State of New South Wales (2016) 91 NSWLR 636; [2016] NSWCA 57 State of New South Wales v Grooms (Final) [2019] NSWSC 353 State of New South Wales v Lynn [2013] NSWSC 1147 Category: Principal judgment Parties: State of New South Wales (Plaintiff) Stuart Charles Doherty (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: C McGorey E Kerkyasharian
Solicitors: Office of the Crown Solicitor (Plaintiff) Legal Aid NSW (Defendant) File Number(s): 2018/272654
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate