NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Kim v R [2019] NSWCCA 165 Hearing dates: 6 February 2019 Date of orders: 24 July 2019 Decision date: 24 July 2019 Before: Payne JA at [1] Button J at [3] Lonergan J [4] Decision: (a) Leave to appeal against sentence is granted. (b) Appeal allowed. (c) Set aside the sentence imposed by the District Court on 13 October 2017 and in place thereof impose: (i) a non-parole period of 3 years to date from 3 December 2017 to expire on 2 December 2020. (ii) a balance term of 2 years to expire on 2 December 2022. (iii) the applicant will be eligible for release on parole on 2 December 2020. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal – leave to appeal against sentence – whether insufficient disparity – whether disparity evokes justifiable sense of grievance – whether sentence was manifestly excessive – leave to appeal granted – appeal allowed – applicant resentenced Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 112(2) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 5 Cases Cited: R v Goundar (2000) 127 A Crim R 33; [2001] NSWCCA 198 Stocco, Gino v R; Stocco, Mark v R [2018] NSWCCA 77 KR v R [2012] NSWCCA 32 R v Hearne [2001] NSWCCA 37 BP v R (2010) 201 A Crim R 379; [2010] NSWCCA 159 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Gyu Tae Kim (Applicant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: S Howell (Applicant) E Balodis (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate