NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: State of New South Wales v RP (Preliminary) [2019] NSWSC 937 Hearing dates: 22 July 2019 Decision date: 24 July 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: R A Hulme J Decision: The application for interim orders set out in Prayers 1 and 2 of the Summons is dismissed. Catchwords: HIGH RISK OFFENDER – serious sex offender – Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) – preliminary hearing – interim supervision order sought – whether matters, if proved, would satisfy Court to high degree of probability that defendant poses unacceptable risk of committing another serious offence – most offences committed when defendant was a child – last offence committed almost seven years ago – history of compliance with supervision requirements – well-validated utility of risk of recidivism instruments – acknowledgement of limitations of instruments in assessment of actual risk – proposed orders not justified Legislation Cited: Child Protection (Offenders Prohibition Orders) Act 2004 (NSW0, s 5(1) Child Protection (Offenders Registration) Act 2000 (NSW) Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 (NSW), s 15A Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 61J, 61M(1), 66A, 66C(1), 66C(3), 66D Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW), ss 3(1), 5(1), 5B(d), 7(4), 10A(b) Cases Cited: Regina v RP [2018] NSWDC 125 RP v R (2015) 90 NSWLR 234; [2015] NSWCCA 215 RP v The Queen (2016) 259 CLR 641; [2016] HCA 53 State of New South Wales v Carter (Preliminary) [2019] NSWSC 236 State of New South Wales v TT (Final) [2018] NSWSC 358 State of New South Wales v XXX (Preliminary) [2019] NSWSC 75 Category: Principal judgment Parties: State of New South Wales (Plaintiff) RP (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr H El-Hage (Plaintiff) Mr H White (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate