NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Best v Rosamond [2019] NSWDC 344 Hearing dates: 16 – 17 July 2019 Date of orders: 24 July 2019 Decision date: 24 July 2019 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Abadee DCJ Decision: See paragraph 140. Catchwords: TORTS – intentional tort - assault.
LIMITATION OF ACTIONS – whether the plaintiff's action is time-barred by limitation period – discoverability – whether injury was "sufficiently serious to justify the bringing of an action on the cause of action" – whether claimant "ought to have known" of the relevant fact.
DAMAGES – past out-of-pocket expenses – future out-of-pocket expenses – general damages – diminution in earning capacity – aggravated damages.
EVIDENCE – whether Jones v Dunkel inference should be drawn for failure to call third party witness. Cases Cited: Baker-Morrison v State of New South Wales (2009) 74 NSWLR 454 Ditchburn v Seltsam Pty Ltd (1989) 17 NSWLR 697 Fabre v Arenales (1992) 27 NSWLR 437 Lamb v Cotogno (1987) 164 CLR 1 New South Wales v Ibbett [2006] HCA 57 New South Wales v Riley (2003) 57 NSWLR 496 Payne v Parker (1976) 1 NSWLR 191 Purkess v Crittenden (1965) 114 CLR 164; [1966] ALR 98 Rogers v Interpacific Resorts Australia Pty Ltd [2007] QSC 239 Royal North Shore v Henderson (1986) 7 NSWLR 283 State of New South Wales v Gillett [2012] NSWCA 83 Wardley v Western Australia (1992) 175 CLR 514 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mr Best (Plaintiff) Mr Rosamond (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr K Andrews Ms S Walsh
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate