NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Wang v Gu & Anor [2019] NSWDC 356 Hearing dates: 10, 11 and 12 July 2019 Date of orders: 26 July 2019 Decision date: 26 July 2019 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Russell SC DCJ Decision: (1) Judgment for the plaintiff against the first defendant for $265,164; (2) Judgment for the plaintiff against the second defendant for $162,164; (3) Order pursuant to s 99 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 that the plaintiff's solicitor is not entitled to charge the plaintiff any costs for or incidental to the plaintiff's affidavit affirmed on 13 February 2019 or for attending court on 10 July 2019. (4) Order the defendants to pay the plaintiff's costs, but that such costs are not to include any costs of the plaintiff's solicitor for or incidental to the plaintiff's affidavit affirmed on 13 February 2019 or for attending court on 10 July 2019. Catchwords: CONTRACTS – identity of the borrower – whether monies were paid by defendants for plaintiff's benefit – whether there had been repayments of the loans Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Limin Wang (Plaintiff) Rui Gu (First Defendant) Geng Yao (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: A Edington (Plaintiff) Rui Gu (Self-represented) Geng Yao (Self-represented)
Solicitors: Juris Cor Legal (Plaintiff) File Number(s): 2018/55545
Judgment
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate