Zepinic, Vito v Chateau Constructions (Aust) Limited; Zepinic, Nina v Chateau Constructions (Aust) Limited (No 2) [2019] NSWCA 187

Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Zepinic, Vito v Chateau Constructions (Aust) Limited; Zepinic, Nina v Chateau Constructions (Aust) Limited (No 2) [2019] NSWCA 187 Hearing dates: On the papers Decision date: 30 July 2019 Before: Bell P at [1]; Macfarlan JA at [2]; Simpson AJA at [3] Decision: In proceedings 2017/180325: The notice of motion filed on 17 December 2018 be dismissed with costs.

In proceedings 2017/180327: The notice of motion filed on 17 December 2018 be dismissed with costs. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – Uniform Civil Procedure Rules r 36.16 – where orders dispositive of appeal have been made – where applicants seek orders setting aside judgment and allowing the appeals – whether asserted error in judgment readily identifiable, readily rectifiable or inadvertent Legislation Cited: Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 75A Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 36.15, 36.16 Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 (NSW), ss 4, 8 Cases Cited: Autodesk Inc v Dyason (No 2) (1993) 176 CLR 300; [1993] HCA 6 Chateau Constructions (Aust) Ltd v Zepinic; Zepinic v Chateau Constructions (Aust) Ltd [2018] NSWSC 963 Collins (alias Hass) v The Queen (1975) 133 CLR 120; [1975] HCA 60 Majak v Rose (No 5) [2017] NSWCA 238 Vito Zepinic v Chateau Constructions (Aust) Limited; Nina Zepinic v Chateau Constructions (Aust) Limited [2018] NSWCA 317 Zepinic v Chateau Constructions (Aust) Limited; Chateau Constructions (Aust) Limited v Zepinic [2017] NSWSC 582 Texts Cited: Hague Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: In proceedings 2017/180325: Vitomir Zepinic (Appellant) Chateau Constructions (Aust) Ltd (Respondent)