NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Liang v University of Technology Sydney (No 2) [2019] NSWSC 956 Hearing dates: 26 July 2019 Decision date: 26 July 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: R A Hulme J Decision: 1. Subpoenas set aside 2. Leave of a judge required for any further subpoenas 3. Indemnity costs ordered Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – hearings – adjournment – asserted grounds for adjournment irrelevant to application – application refused CIVIL PROCEDURE – subpoenas – application to set aside – categories of material either unavailable or irrelevant – verification of material beyond scope of what subpoena can do – no legitimate forensic purpose – subpoenas set aside – plaintiff restrained from obtaining issue of further subpoenas without leave of judge on notice to defendants COSTS – party/party – bases of quantification – indemnity basis – merits of application accepted – application granted Cases Cited: Commissioner for Fair Trading v Jonval Builders Pty Limited & Ors [2017] NSWSC 1045 Liang v University of Technology Sydney [2018] NSWSC 1740 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Guohua Liang (Plaintiff) University of Technology Sydney (First defendant) John Colville (Second defendant) Max Hendriks (Third defendant) Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff (Self-represented) Defendants (Mr A Flecknoe-Brown)
Solicitors: Barry Nilsson Lawyers (Defendants) File Number(s): 2018/329329
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate