NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Davison v Legal Profession Admission Board [2019] NSWSC 959 Hearing dates: 23, 25 May, 20, 21 June 2018 Decision date: 06 August 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: McCallum J Decision: Appeal dismissed Catchwords: PROFESSIONS AND TRADES – lawyers – application for readmission to practice following decision to remove name from Roll – whether plaintiff is a "fit and proper person" to be admitted to the Australian legal profession Legislation Cited: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), s 309P Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 91 Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth), s 264 Legal Profession Act 1987 (NSW), s 25(1) Legal Profession Uniform Admission Rules 2015 (NSW), r 10(1) Legal Profession Uniform Law, ss 16(1), 17, 17(2)(b), 26(1), 28(1) Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth), ss 8C(1)(a), 8C(1)(f) Cases Cited: Council of the New South Wales Bar Association v Davison [2005] NSWADT 252 Council of the New South Wales Bar Association v Davison [2006] NSWSC 65 Council of the NSW Bar Association v Davison [2006] NSWSC 699 Davison v Council of the New South Wales Bar Association [2007] NSWCA 227 Dawson v Law Society of New South Wales [1989] NSWCA 58 Ex parte Dennis; Re The Legal Practitioners Act (Court of Appeal (NSW), Samuels JA, 23 December 1988, unrep) Ex parte Tziniolos; Re Medical Practitioners Act (1966) 66 SR (NSW) 448 Gregory v Queensland Law Society Incorporated [2002] 2 QDR 583; [2001] QCA 499 Hilton v Legal Profession Admission Board [2016] NSWSC 1617 Hilton v Legal Profession Admission Board [2017] NSWCA 232 King v Muriniti [2018] NSWCA 98 New South Wales Bar Association v Cummins [2001] NSWCA 284 Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of New South Wales v Montenegro [2015] NSWCA 409 Saunders v Legal Profession Admission Board [2015] NSWSC 1839 The Council of the Law Society of NSW v Seymour [1999] NSWCA 117 Category: Principal judgment Parties: William Roy Davison (plaintiff) Legal Profession Admission Board (first defendant) The New South Wales Bar Association (second defendant) Representation: Counsel: M Condon SC, J Heazlewood (plaintiff) K Richardson SC, NB Oreb (second defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate