NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Chen v Fang [2019] NSWSC 960 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 30 July 2019 Decision date: 30 July 2019 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Darke J Decision: Leave granted to Cross-Claimants to discontinue Cross-Claim on the basis that the Cross-Claimants pay the Cross-Defendants' costs of the Cross-Claim on the ordinary basis. Catchwords: COSTS – discontinuance of proceedings – whether positive ground or good reason to depart from the default position under Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) ("UCPR"), r 42.19 – cross-claimants guaranteed repayment of a loan under a Deed of Loan and Deed of Guarantee – where cross-claimants filed a Cross-Claim seeking to be discharged from various agreements including the Deed of Loan and Deed of Guarantee – where loan subsequently repaid by borrower – whether repayment of loan rendered Cross-Claim futile due to a supervening event – only part of Cross-Claim rendered futile by reason of the repayment – no reason to depart from the default position under UCPR r 42.19
COSTS – discontinuance of proceedings – terms of discontinuance – application by cross-defendants for the cross-claimants to pay indemnity costs – whether Cross-Claim raised hopeless or futile claims – whether pursuit of Cross-Claim involved an abuse of process – where pleadings in Cross-Claim were in certain respects deficient – whether cross-claimants unnecessarily prolonged the prosecution of the Cross-Claim – costs assessed on the ordinary basis Legislation Cited: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), s 87, Sch 2 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 13.4, 42.19 Cases Cited: Australiawide Airlines Ltd v Aspirion Pty Ltd [2006] NSWCA 365 Bitannia Pty Ltd v Parkline Constructions Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 32 Edwards Madigan Torzillo Briggs Pty Ltd v Stack [2003] NSWCA 302 Fordyce v Fordham (2006) 67 NSWLR 497; [2006] NSWCA 274 McGuirk v University of New South Wales [2009] NSWSC 1424 One.Tel Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (2000) 101 FCR 548 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72; [1998] HCA 11 Ralph Lauren 57 Pty Limited v Byron Shire Council [2014] NSWCA 107; (2014) 199 LGERA 424 Re Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs; Ex parte Lai Qin (1997) 186 CLR 622 Wentworth v Rogers (No 5) (1986) 6 NSWLR 534 Category: Costs Parties: Changqui Chen (Plaintiff/First Cross-Defendant) Leo Shi Ran Fang (First Defendant/First Cross-Claimant) Weixiong Liu (Second Defendant/Second Cross-Claimant) Newton Park Pty Ltd (Third Defendant/Second Cross-Defendant) Peter Lord (Third Cross-Defendant) Jingxiong Liang (Fourth Cross-Defendant) The International Equine Group Pty Ltd (Fifth Cross-Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr F Santisi (Plaintiff/First Cross-Defendant) Mr J Baird (First Defendant/First Cross-Claimant and Second Defendant/Second Cross-Claimant) Mr A Hopkins (Third Defendant/Second Cross-Defendant, Third and Fifth Cross-Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate