NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Blaze Advertising Pty Ltd v Momentum Accounting Pty Ltd [2019] NSWSC 962 Hearing dates: 29 July 2019 Date of orders: 31 July 2019 Decision date: 31 July 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Harrison J Decision: (1) Judgment for Blaze Advertising Pty Ltd against Cardinal House Pty Ltd and Paul Carroll for $719,943.97 together with interest up to judgment in the amount of $127,123.52. (2) Order Cardinal House Pty Ltd and Paul Carroll to pay Blaze Advertising Pty Ltd's costs of the proceedings, specified as a gross sum pursuant to s 98(4)(c) of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 in the amount of $77,500. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – where defendant failed to appear – whether judgment should be given against defendant pursuant to UCPR r 29.7(3)
COSTS – where plaintiff made offer of compromise to defendant – whether costs on an indemnity basis should be awarded – whether a gross sum costs order should be made Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 58, 98(4)(c) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 29.7(3) Cases Cited: Hamod v State of New South Wales (No 13) [2009] NSWSC 756 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Blaze Advertising Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Momentum Accounting Pty Ltd (First Defendant) Cardinall House Pty Ltd (Second Defendant) John Halliley (Third Defendant) Paul Carroll (Fourth Defendant) Representation: Counsel: P M Knowles (Plaintiff)
Solicitors: Somerville Legal (Plaintiff) File Number(s): 2017/139068 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate