NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Fangaloka [2019] NSWCCA 173 Hearing dates: 22 July 2019 Date of orders: 02 August 2019 Decision date: 02 August 2019 Before: Basten JA at [1]; Johnson J at [77]; Price J at [78] Decision: (1) Allow the Director's appeal and set aside the sentence imposed on the offender in the District Court on 2 April 2019.
(2) Sentence the offender to a non-parole period of 20 months, with an additional term of 10 months, giving a sentence of 2 years 6 months.
(3) Direct that the sentence commence on 2 August 2019.
(4) Note that the offender will first be eligible for parole on a date 20 months after the sentence is imposed, namely on 1 April 2021. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentencing – robbery in company – application of Henry criteria – causing actual bodily harm – wholly concurrent sentences – imprisonment to be served by intensive correction order
CRIMINAL LAW – sentencing – appeal against inadequacy of sentence – misapprehension of facts – failure to give effect to expressed intent to accumulate sentences – misapplication of principle in The Queen v De Simoni – manifest inadequacy
CRIMINAL LAW – sentencing – intensive correction order – community safety as paramount consideration – extent to which additional purposes of sentencing affect determination – consideration of statements in R v Pullen
WORDS AND PHRASES – "adequately punished" – "community safety" – "paramount consideration" Legislation Cited: Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999 (NSW), s 158 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 3A, 5, 7, 8, 9, 66, 67, 68; Pts 5, 7, 8 Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 4, 97 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5D Weapons Prohibition Act 1998 (NSW), Sch 1 Cases Cited: Davies v R [2019] NSWCCA 45 Douar v The Queen (2005) 159 A Crim R 154; [2005] NSWCCA 455 Kentwell v The Queen (2014) 252 CLR 601; [2014] HCA 37 Liao v R [2007] NSWCCA 132 Newman (a pseudonym) v R [2019] NSWCCA 157 R v Carroll; Carroll v The Queen (2010) 77 NSWLR 45; [2010] NSWCCA 55 R v Dodd (1991) 57 A Crim R 349 R v Geddes (1936) 36 SR (NSW) 554 R v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 346; [1999] NSWCCA 111 R v Pullen [2018] NSWCCA 264 R v Zamagias [2002] NSWCCA 17 The Queen v De Simoni (1981) 147 CLR 383; [1981] HCA 31 Texts Cited: Legislative Assembly, Hansard, 11 October 2017, Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Amendment (Sentencing Options) Bill 2017 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (Appellant) Tevita Fangaloka (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Ms T Smith (Appellant) Ms M Avenell (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate