NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Davison v R [2019] NSWCCA 179 Hearing dates: 24 July 2019 Date of orders: 05 August 2019 Decision date: 05 August 2019 Before: Gleeson JA at [1]; Johnson J at [2]; Price J at [3] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted. (2) Appeal allowed. (3) Quash the sentences imposed in the District Court of New South Wales on 22 June 2018. (4) For the offence of stealing a motor vehicle contrary to s 154F of the Crimes Act 1900 and taking into account the offence on the Form 1, the applicant is sentenced to a fixed term of imprisonment of 9 months commencing on 2 February 2018 and expiring on 1 November 2018. (5) For the offence of aggravated break and enter with intent to commit a serious indictable offence contrary to s 113(2) of the Crimes Act, the applicant is sentenced to 2 years 9 months imprisonment consisting of a non-parole period of 18 months commencing on 2 May 2018 and expiring on 1 November 2019 with a balance of term of 15 months commencing on 2 November 2019 and expiring on 1 February 2021. (6) The earliest date the applicant will be eligible to be released on parole is 1 November 2019. Catchwords: CRIME – Appeals – Appeal against sentence – stealing motor vehicle and aggravated break and enter – applicant pleaded guilty whereas co-offender was found guilty after jury trial – parity – whether disparity in sentences explained by differences in subjective cases – whether justifiable sense of grievance – whether reduction in sentence would produce an erroneously lenient sentence – whether co-offender's sentence manifestly inadequate – consideration of head sentence and non-parole period – re-sentence Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) ss 113, 154F Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) ss 11, 22A Cases Cited: Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 462; [2011] HCA 49 Kentwell v The Queen (2014) 252 CLR 601; [2014] HCA 37 Postiglione v The Queen (1997) 189 CLR 295; [1997] HCA 26 R v Hall [2017] NSWCCA 313 R v Kollas and Mitchell [2002] NSWCCA 491 R v llbay [2000] NSWCCA 251 R v Reilly; R v Smith [2012] NSWCCA 166 R v Thomson; R v Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383; [2000] NSWCCA 309 Saraya v R [2015] NSWCCA 63 Youkhana v R [2011] NSWCCA 37 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mervyn John Davison (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: S Fraser (Applicant) D Patch (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate