NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Davidson (No. 1) [2019] NSWSC 980 Hearing dates: 29 July 2019 Date of orders: 02 August 2019 Decision date: 02 August 2019 Before: Davies J Decision: 1. The Crown's application to lead the evidence as tendency evidence is rejected.
2. The Crown's application to lead the evidence as context evidence is rejected Catchwords: EVIDENCE – tendency evidence – criminal proceedings - admissibility of tendency evidence in a murder trial - whether the evidence was indeed tendency evidence - where the evidence said to evince a tendency only pointed to one prior instance of similar conduct - evidence did not amount to tendency evidence and application rejected
EVIDENCE - context evidence – criminal proceedings - admissibility of context evidence in a murder trial - - where the trial is to be conducted by judge alone – whether accused prejudiced in the context of a judge-alone trial - real issue was whether the context evidence had probative value – evidence not necessary to explain any aspect of the present offending - application to lead the evidence as context evidence rejected
EVIDENCE - evidence of judgments and convictions - s 91 Evidence Act - where the Crown sought to use findings of fact from an earlier judgment to prove the existence of a fact in the present trial - impermissible use of evidence Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) ss 23A, 37, 423C Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) ss 91, 97, 135, 137 Cases Cited: DJV v R [2008] NSWCCA 272; (2008) 200 A Crim R 206 ES v R (No.1) [2010] NSWCCA 197 Hughes v The Queen [2017] HCA 20; (2017) 92 ALJR 52 R v Bauer (a pseudonym) [2018] HCA 40; (2018) 92 ALJR 846 R v Droudis (No. 13) [2016] NSWSC 1350 R v Mervyn Davidson [2018] NSWDC 45 R v Qaumi & Qaumi [2016] NSWSC 1473 R v Qaumi & Qaumi (No 2) [2016] NSWSC 1487 RHB v R [2011] VSCA 295 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Crown Mervyn Keith Davidson (Accused) Representation: Counsel: P Lynch (Crown) A Norrie (Accused)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate