NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Smilevska v Smilevska (No. 5) [2019] NSWSC 986 Hearing dates: 20 March, 7 May and 15 May 2019 Date of orders: 06 August 2019 Decision date: 06 August 2019 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Slattery J Decision: See [86] of judgment. Catchwords: COSTS – specified gross sum instead of assessed costs – Civil Procedure Act, s 98(4)(c) – plaintiffs and second defendant are each partially successful in contested proceedings in relation to the ownership in equity of a domestic residence held in the name of the first defendant – the first defendant dies in the course of the proceedings – costs orders made that the defendants pay part of the plaintiff's costs – the residence is sold – the sale proceeds are available to be administered by Court order – the first defendant's case conducted by her attorneys and by a tutor – the proceeds of sale are the only likely source of funds to pay the parties' costs – no costs assessment has taken place – whether a specified gross sum order should be made instead of an award of assessed costs – if so, what is the appropriate amount of such a specified gross sum, in respect of the first defendant's costs, her tutor's and attorneys' costs and the plaintiff's costs – history of jurisdiction to make specified gross sum orders instead of assessed costs discussed – whether the plaintiff's costs should be deducted from the fund before it is distributed to the plaintiff and the first defendant. Legislation Cited: Powers of Attorney Act 2003, s 38(3) Civil Procedure Act 2005, s 98(4)(c) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 7.10(2)(a) Cases Cited: Australasian Performing Rights Assoc Ltd v Marlin [1999] FCA 1006 Beach Petroleum NL & Claremont Petroleum NL v Johnson (1995) 57 FCR 119 Clune, Re; Ex parte Verge v Isabella Nominees Pty Ltd (in liq) (1988) 14 ACLR 261 Edgar & Walker v Mead (1916) 23 CLR 29 Hadid v Lenfest Communications Inc [2000] FCA 628 Hardoon v Belilios (1901) AC 118 Harrison v Schipp (2002) 54 NSWLR 738 NSW Trustee & Guardian v Hull (No. 2) [2011] NSWSC 1361 Octava Investments Pty Ltd v Knight (1979) 144 CLR 360 Rajski & Anor v Computer Manufacture and Design Pty Ltd [1981] 2 NSWLR 798 MF Global Australia (in liq) (No. 2), Re [2012] NSWSC 1426 Silva v Czarnikow Limited (1960) 104 SJ 369 Smilevska v Smilevska [2015] NSWSC 1794 Smilevska v Smilevska (No. 2) [2016] NSWSC 397 Smilevska v Smilevska (No. 3) [2017] NSWSC 820 Smilevska v Smilevska (No. 4) [2018] NSWSC 1847 Starr-Diamond v Diamond (No. 4) [2013] NSWSC 811 Willmott v Barber (1881) 17 Ch D 772 Texts Cited: J D Heydon and M J Leeming, Jacobs' Law of Trusts in Australia (8th Ed, 2016, LexisNexis) G.E. Dal Pont, Powers of Attorney (2nd Ed, 2015, Lexis Nexis) Category: Costs Parties: Plaintiff/Applicant: Temjana Smilevska First Defendant: Blaguna Smilevska Second Defendant: Blagoja Smilevski First Cross Claimant: Mitre Sarafoski Second Cross Claimant: Gorica Sarafoska Representation: Counsel:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate